Website Security Review
A structured review of a website's public-facing security posture and configuration.
Independent security review and authorized penetration testing for systems you are authorized to test — with clear scope, written authorization and a remediation report, not automated scanning sold as a service.
This service is built for businesses that need an independent, professional security review — not for open-ended or unsolicited testing.
Security testing and penetration testing are performed only on systems for which the client is authorized to request testing. Scope, systems in and out of bounds, and testing windows are agreed in writing before any assessment begins.
Each area below is performed only within the agreed and authorized scope of an engagement.
A structured review of a website's public-facing security posture and configuration.
Checking server, hosting and application configuration against common security risks.
Mapping what is publicly exposed and reachable, and whether it should be.
Identifying known vulnerability classes across the reviewed systems.
Reviewing login, session and access-control behavior for common weaknesses.
Hands-on, scoped testing performed only within an agreed and authorized scope.
These boundaries exist to keep every engagement safe, legal and predictable.
Authorization is the first step, not a footnote at the end of a proposal.
Every engagement starts with a scoping conversation. These describe typical depth, not confirmed pricing or timelines.
A structured, non-intrusive review of security configuration, exposure and common weak points.
A deeper assessment identifying and documenting vulnerability classes across authorized systems.
Hands-on, scoped penetration testing performed strictly within an authorized and agreed scope.
Not sure which fits? Get a Quote →
Common questions about authorization, scope and reporting.
You need to be the owner of the system, or have documented authorization from the owner, before any assessment or testing begins.
No. We do not test systems belonging to a third party without that third party's own explicit permission.
Written confirmation from the system owner that testing is permitted, along with an agreed scope, systems in and out of bounds, and a testing window.
Assessment types and testing windows are chosen to minimize disruption, and any risk to production systems is discussed and agreed before testing begins.
Findings are documented with severity and context, and delivered with practical remediation guidance.
Yes. Every engagement ends with a written report covering findings, risk context and remediation guidance.
Tell us about the system you're authorized to test, and we'll follow up to define scope and next steps.